[00:00:05] You're listening to casual talk radio, where common sense is still the norm, whether you're a new or a longtime listener. We appreciate you joining us today. Visit
[email protected] dot and now here's your host, Leister. I really didn't want to talk about what happened with P. Diddy, aka puff daddy, but it's probably appropriate. It ties into the women under attack messaging that I've done. My name is Lyster. I'm your host. Thank you. Whether you're new or you're not new, and if you are new, my message has been for a couple of episodes. Now that women are under attack, the p. Diddy situation brought more stuff to light, and I figured it was appropriate for me to extend that with some other things that I was hearing and seeing around what's going on, because I think it's. I think some of it's being misrepresented to be, to be frank. I think some of it's being misrepresented into something that it's not and some context. There's. There's fallacies in how people are connecting the dots with what happened and what's going on where I don't think it's what's being stated. I think it's a little bit different than that. To kind of preface, I want to play a little bit of a snippet from Eddie Griffin and something he said, and this would have been eight years ago. He was on VLAD TV. VLAD TV is the most notorious, in my opinion, podcast host, because he has a lot of these different celebrities on the show, and they expose a lot of things. They talk about. They talk a lot. It's. People have speculated this guy might be undercover FBI. I don't know that for sure. But the whole Keith D. He put his stuff out there, and all these people put stuff out there. The next thing you know, they're getting run up on. So I want to play something from Eddie Griffin that I think ties into this here. There's no criminal charge. Speaker one. There is a systematic effort to destroy every black male entertainment entertainer's image. They want us all to have an actress by name. Kobe raped a white woman in Colorado.
[00:02:20] Doctor Cosby raped 37 bitches and is still counting.
[00:02:26] Nobody leaves this business clean. Michael Jackson fucked little white children. Michael Jordan. Michael Jordan gambled. Mm. Right. And then his dad got killed. You understand?
[00:02:38] You're not going to die clean. I mean, so I, again, that was like eight years ago that he said that on Vlad. And the thing with it the big picture of the whole thing. Right. What he's talking about is the pattern of the focus around black entertainers. So obviously, there's p. Diddy, there's Morgan Freeman. That was recently, he was accused of some stuff. There's Kobe Bryant. Before he died, he was accused of stuff. There's Bill Cosby, there's R. Kelly. And this, the default response I know is coming my way is, yeah, but they did those things. Let's go down the list, and then I'm going to talk about another piece here.
[00:03:22] And just to clarify, this isn't defending when there's true, you know, things that happen. So let's talk Bill Cosby, because he's the most notorious. Bill Cosby was on the air admitting that he would do pills, essentially on women. The difference, and I think where the media distorted it, the difference is that there was never a situation where something happened that was not part of the known. So Eddie Griffin in this same segment, I do recommend you check it on YouTube, talks about how, okay, these are women, that they go to the hotel room of a no married man. Right. Alone. And then the narrative gets distorted again into victim shaming or blaming. And that's not it. These are key questions we must ask. See, my biggest, I'll admit, fallacy is that I dig beyond what makes me angry. It's not about what makes me angry. I was just reading an article the other day about some man. It's essentially a man that got surgery to do breastfeeding for a kid. And that's the most for me. It makes me angry to the point I know if I was in physical presence with that person, I would, I would snap and I would beat the crap out of them because we can't know the later impacts on that child. It's child abuse. So for me, that sets me off. It bothers me. And I don't even need to dig in the question. I know it's because medical, the medical side, they can't say no unless the law allows them to say no. They have to provide treatment. They can't say no. So the governments have failed people to say, this is wrong, we're not going to do it. If you want breastfeeding, it must be a female, as in biological female, not a mechanical female, not one that's surgical. It has to be a biological female because we can't know genetically what might happen to that child. And you're thinking, well, he's a transphobe. No. Think of the reason why incest is outlawed, why it's banned in the vast majority. It's because we know there's a genetic impact on any kids that come from that association. Because genetics don't play that. They don't, they don't blend well, and you end up with deformed kids. Even if you can give birth, the kids have deformities. This is a medical fact. So now we're talking about this breast milk that we don't know what the impact is until later. My thing is, why are we rushing to it now when it's an untested, unknown thing, when we're not learning from history?
[00:05:57] That's what it is. It has nothing to do with whether the bottom line is it's a man. So men were not biologically predisposed to give, you know, breast milk. Are some out there that do? Sure. But we don't know what that means in terms of a child ingesting that. We're talking an infant, a toddler. We don't know what the impact is. We don't know if that kid will have deformities as a result of it. That's the formative stages. We can't know. The unknown is what bothers me. I don't mind it if you do a study for ten years, 20 years, let's test it in a safe space with not real humanot, with humans in a safe space. Let's do some analysis. Let's understand the impact. And if we don't see a harm in it, then it's fine. We've not done that. That's what bothers me.
[00:06:43] So mentally, my point there is I get bothered when I see medical or anything rush to that. They rush to it without understanding the downstream impacts of it. Now let's come back to Bill Cosby with Bill Cosby. The story was, okay, you're going to the room of a married man. Let's start there and ask the question why the messaging is always career? I was worried about getting fired. I was. I didn't know which. I hate that one. But there's some excuse, okay? There's some excuse. And it's an excuse. It is an excuse because he's a married man. You know, he's a married man because in a stand up, he talks about his wife with the Kabil and the kids and the. So it's not a mystery that he's married.
[00:07:26] I've been in a situation on twice now. I've been in a situation where me not being single, I've been in a hotel, you know, actual hotel space, not a room but a space with somebody else who was an attractive female where at least on one of those, I'm pretty sure if I had an, if I had initiated, something would happen. I'm not a homewrecker, so I didn't. But I'm pretty sure I could have. In fact, I got chewed out for not even making any sort of, like, I didn't even try. I maintained distance. I was arm's length. I was not about to do it because I wasn't trying to be a homewrecker. I didn't want things to go down. And most importantly, I didn't want a me too situation later, if it did start a consensual, and then all of a sudden, later, years later, it gets accused that it wasn't consensual when it was. Now, this isn't an era before cell phones and recording shit and all this. So I took the conservative approach, as I tend to do. If it's somebody where, you know, it's a friend of mine and we've been doing for years and I know them very well, and she initiates. Okay? But if it's somebody that I don't know you that well, or maybe we're just work associates or something, I'm not doing it. You know, I don't dip my pen in the company. So mentally, for me, I'm looking at it as, this is a co worker, okay? If you go to the room, so you're invited. Okay. So that man initiated some side of contact, but it's a hotel room, so we're talking room now with beds and alcohol in place. Like, at what point do you say, you know what? I'm not going to drink any alcohol. I don't want none of your drinks. I'll bring my own bottle of water. Like, you take an approach of assuming this dude's about to try to do something sketchy and place that, and place that responsibility on that shoulder and say, why aren't you going in there cautious and conservative, then the excuse is, well, I trusted them. Why? Why is there a blind trust? You should never. Blind trust. I'm not suggesting that you're skeptical of everybody 100%, but there should be a basic level of blind trust. Think about it. If you're on a plane, if you're on a plane, you're in mixed company, in close seating. Isn't it possible that somebody could sexually assault you on the damn plane? Absolutely. You could be sat next to some creep, you wouldn't know it. You'd have no way of knowing it. So in your mind, I would hope that people are a little bit cautious about where they're sitting and mindful about who they're sitting next to. And you can't control it all the time, but hopefully you're mindful of it, because if you fall asleep and it's just some creepy, what's to stop them from reaching over under your dress or something? Nothing. So that. So you have to be. And that's the unfortunate reality of the world we live in. You can't know who. What company you're mixed with when it's that kind of, you know, situation. So if here, you're going to a room where you were invited, I would expect that. Okay. I can control that. I can control the situation, and I'm not going to go in blindly trusting they may be cool as a fan. Okay. Let's make sure that I'm in control of my faculties at all points. I'm not going to take any drink from them. I'm going to bring my own bottle of water. That's basic, right? I'm just going to bring my own stuff. If you want to get drunk, because whatever, maybe it's stressful or something, that's fine. Then you say, I'll pour my own drink. I'll do that. Understanding that when you're inebriated, you lose control of certain faculties, and so shit goes down. Right. So then the narrative in some of this Bill Cosby business was, well, yeah, some of them willingly did so. But at some point later, they regretted it. Okay, but that's different. So now we're talking about differences in crime. Is the crime that they plied you with alcohol? That's different than the crime was. I regretted something where I willingly, you know, partook of it, and then I ended up regretting it. And they didn't stop. Should he stop? Sure. If he knew that that's really what you wanted. But if you're inebriated again, you're not in control of your faculties, which is my beef with alcohol and why I've been straight edge, because I don't like what that does to anybody, but certainly to women. Society has created this narrative that, you know, we can't blame the alcohol. We've got to blame the alcohol. Because in many cases, when alcohol or weed or some other drug is not involved, women seem to be much smarter about those decisions. I'm talking about, okay, this dude's probably about to be some sketchy stuff. And, yes, they are very hands off. And yes, they are. Leave me alone. Or in the free love era of the sixties and the seventies. They're like, yeah, we're down. But then they don't go back and talk about regretting it. So now this gets me over into the R. Kelly situation from Bill Cosby. In the R. Kelly situation, it's two. Part one is the Aaliyah stuff. Aaliyah, willingly, as a minor, lied about her age to marry this guy. Why ever she did that, I don't know, but. Because we can't ask her. She's dead. But the point is, she willingly, willingly lied about her age to marry this guy, allegedly on a bus. They were having sex. This was a consensual something after the fact. There were all these stories from Dane Dash and other people who were friends with Aaliyah that would say, yeah, but that was shady. What he did might be because he's a creeper. Right. But we. We can't ignore the initial start of this, which is, as a minor, she willingly lied about her age to marry this guy. Okay? And during that time, minors lying about their age to get fake ids. And. And all this were common. It was. It shouldn't have been, but it was common. This is why there was an evolution to identification documents, to try to secure them, to try to prevent fake ids being a thing. But that was a real thing. Girls would lie all the time about their age. To get alcohol, to get cigarettes, to get into clubs. That was a common thing during that period of time. I would argue it's less so now than it used to be, but that it just was what it was. It was a common thing. So then the other part, the girl that he was. And it's really three part with R. Kelly, but this other one connects to this other. So that the video with him urinating on the girl, first of all, you can't tell what her age. If you look at her, she looks like she's over 18. We know that she wasn't. But my point is, if you visually looked at it, she looks like she's over 18. So when that video first came out, nobody thought anything of it because it's like, okay, well, that's just whatever. Cause she looked like she's over. And that was the other narrative is some girls, despite being under 18, just visually look like they're older than what they are. I know when I was in my teen years, there were girls. I'm 16. She's allegedly 16, but she looks like she's 20. That was a common thing, which is why they got away with the whole fake id business. Now, you get in this whole sex cult accusation with R. Kelly, and the girl in question would come out in videos and say, no, it didn't happen. This is not true. And then later would say, yes, it did. And this. And so she's flip flopping. R. Kelly gets locked up. The whole video with Gayle King, with R. Kelly. He's pissed off. It's clear he's pissed off. Then you see all these body language experts talking about, yep, that's a lie. Yep, that's a lie. Yep, that's a lie. You can say the body language seemed to indicate that he's not telling the truth, but it doesn't necessarily mean that he has done what was claimed. We still don't have any direct evidence of anything that was claimed other than the Aaliyah situation and the Aaliyah situation. It's in docs, right. He, there's a marriage certificate. So we knew that happened, but that was passed the statute. Then when the sex cult thing came around, the question was, how can these grown women allow this man to control them? The response was power. Well, how can he have power over them? Her family. Her family. The girl's family would come out and say, yeah, that's what it was. He was just controlling it. That. And then she said, no, that's not it. Nobody controlled me. I chose to do this stuff. If you were to look on recent articles, you'll see that that same girl allegedly was getting, trying to get pregnant with R. Kelly. Why he's locked up. So now the flipped happened again. Do you see? What I'm saying is, okay, it's probably true that this guy had some sort of, I'll say, charm control over this girl, because the first time she denies it happens. Then she goes back and says, yes, it did happen. That's what it was. Then she comes back and says, well, no, I still love him and tries to have a kid with him. So that's, that is charm. That is not any sort of control that the girl, she had control of it. She's an attractive young lady. She can get any dude she wants, but there's a charm about him. So now as we talk about this whole charm situation, now we get into this current with P. Diddy.
[00:16:04] And the reason I linked it that way is all of these are around a charm. There's a level of charm that goes with this that doesn't make any damn sense. It makes no sense, but that's what it is with the p. Diddy situation. There's so much to it. That I'm not going to go all the way around it. But the Pe Didi situation starts decades ago. It starts when he's starting to rise to power. There's theory around him and Kim, which was his wife before that, passed away. There's theories around the reason that they separated and that there was more to it than just a regular breakup. When the J. Lo thing happened, that happened. It came and it went and people were kind of surprised that that happened. It came and went and there was never any sort of chat about it anymore. There was never any revisit. Nothing ever happened. Since then. The whole Cassie and all these other players come around, the Fonzworth Bentley comes around and people that are making, they're at least implicating certain activities and behaviors they didn't agree with. And there's a pattern to what they're saying.
[00:17:16] So b two k, which was a group way back yonder, there are video, there's photos, I shouldn't say videos. There's a video, but there's photos floating around of them naked in a bed. And nobody knew at the time, first of all, who took the photo. Second, how did this happen? Third, why did it happen? Like, there's all these questions happening around with the b two K era, mind you, when Michael Jackson is getting accused of what he's doing, his accusers, they make all these claims. There is a raid on Michael Jackson's places, just like what happened with Diddy very recently. And the media forced the narrative because of Michael Jackson acting as strange as he did, that Michael Jackson must have done these crimes. He must have done that. He must have done that. There's too much of whatever the. And all they proved, but when the dust settled is that Michael Jackson liked to watch porn. He probably showed them porn. I think it's probable he gave them alcohol. I think all that's probably true. They never found a lick of evidence that he ever sexually assaulted any of those kids. But it's improper, him being in the bed with them. Certainly in less stressed states, that's certainly improper. Him showing them porn is likely improper. Contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Giving alcohol to a minor is certainly a problem, though. That's about the worst that what they found. But remember, that went on for years. That went on for years, years and years and years of them trying to make a case with raids and everything else, only to end up with the basic nothing. I suspect, with this PDD situation and the freak offs and everything else. You got to think the freak offs had to be happening for a long time. The freak offs were not illegal. Okay, so if he's having, whatever, freaky parties or whatnot, that's not illegal, he didn't commit a crime. Is it creepy? Absolutely if it's true. Is it suspect? Absolutely if it's true. And there were, you know, chatterings around the industry for years. You know, Kat Williams, in his interview just recently talked about it, this idea, but, but it's not exclusive to P. Diddy. This idea that for money, you're doing certain favors for certain rich folks. We know that's been a thing, though, in the industry at large for many, many years. We know that's what it is. So. And that's photography, that's video, that's music. You know, you'll see child stars. Think of how many child stars committed suicide, of all the ones that we remember from the yesters that committed suicide or later would claim that they were improperly approached by some executive. The Harvey Weinstein business.
[00:19:44] You think about the kids that were on, like, wonder years and all these older shows, and then later they would come out and say, yeah, they were, they were touching me improperly and they were doing this or asking this or all of that. That was a common thing. It kept happening. So I'm not, I'm not giving the excuse for it. I'm explaining that what is being alleged around p. Diddy does not surprise me because it seemed to be endemic to the industry at large, this idea that when you get to a certain level, you now use that in order to get what you're trying to get. And in the vast majority of cases, not all, but the vast majority of cases, it's a quid pro. It's like, in order for this record deal, this is what I need you to do for me, or in order for you get on that movie, this is what you're gonna need to do. Or, you know, in order for you to get that, you know, record label, whatever, you're gonna need to do this. Or, hey, you know, I want to make you the next star of that movie here, make you the front. So this is what you're gonna need to get. You know, you need to get on your knees or whatever. I mean, let's look at the freaking Bill Clinton, right, Lewinsky. How can it, if it goes all the way up to the, to the, almost swore there, if it goes all the way up to the president, United States getting oral favors in the White House, why do you think it wasn't going to happen down at these lower levels of power. It obviously was going to, but it was not exclusive, is my point to our p. Diddy. He's getting the strong headlines because of social media. Social media is now stoking that fire. And meanwhile, we're ignoring that. This is endemic. It's endemic to power. It's endemic to authority. It's endemic at the highest levels of everywhere. Not just p. Diddy. It's more than this. So now, other people talked about, and this is my close, other people talked about damage to black, you know, celebrities and black culture and everything else. And I laughed. That I do because it's not it. Regardless of P. Diddy, it doesn't have anything to do with a black situation. That's not what we're talking about here. It has nothing to do with it. I just gave you Bill Clinton as an example, Harvey Weinstein as an example. There's tons of various, you know, wealthy people that just happen to do this stuff. And there's, I guarantee you, countless others that never were called out. You know, Ergati was accused of stuff at times. Fat Joe was accused of stuff at times. It doesn't matter. It's. It's not a race situation. It has nothing to do with race. It doesn't hurt the black community. And all that PDD's getting what he's getting. And the reason it doesn't hurt is because you have to look at it as an endemic thing to the overall picture of power. It's endemic to power.
[00:22:27] If you analyze what it is that's going on, you'll realize it's all about the power and the money and the authority that he held. If you take all the accusers now, so we're talking the females and some of the alleged underage assaults and things that were happening. Those are crimes that were committed. But if you look at it in a big picture, it's all in one bubble with just general assault. Right? Sexual assault. That's really what we're born down in, general. Sexual assault. Money for sex, right? Drugs, alcohol. It's. It's this party culture that has been there for decades. In some cases consensual, in some cases not. Now I start thinking about, okay, well, let's look at the consent side of things. If at society, the law, when I say society, society has settled on this idea that if you are not 18 years old, you cannot consent. So if you're a 17 year old, you cannot consent. Okay, so now it creates a crime because there's no consent, regardless of whether or not that person, that child quote, said, you know what? At the time they offered me a record deal and as part of that deal, they wanted a blowjob. I agreed to do it because I wanted the record deal. Society has said that's a crime. Good. He should be locked up if that happened, because it's a crime of what it is. The person, the child, quote, has now said, well, wait a minute. I said I wanted to do that. Society doesn't care what you wanted. You are not, you're not mature enough to have consented. You don't have the maturity to consent to that activity. This is I'm describing. However you're getting angry, you shouldn't because I'm breaking down what the law says, not how I feel about it. It doesn't matter. The law says you cannot consent if you're not 18 years old. So if we now focus on the real nuts and bolts of what we're talking about here, we have accusers, I'm talking female, who have accused him of this type of activity that was non consensual, irrespective of age. We have accused, we have non accusers. So we have allegations and rumors and speculation on the male side. So now I'm talking like usher, etcetera, where there is theories that he might have been having certain improper activities with some of these males who were underage. But there's never been an accusation. Usher's never come out and accused him of a thing. Not that it's always been this guy over here says he saw Diddy do something to somebody as young, whatever. The b two k photos floating around, the photos of Diddy kissing somebody, none of this is a crime because you don't have evidence that he has done a thing to an underage somebody. Is it disgusting? Yeah. Is it a little bit sick, love? More than a little bit. Is it unnerving? Absolutely. Is it disturbing? Absolutely. But you don't have evidence of a crime. So when the, when they raided his homes very most recently and allegedly did, he was on a plane to the Bahamas. Then they said he's not on the plane. So is he running? They don't know did, he's kids and cuffs and this whole stuff. So when they're doing the raid, I, again, I thought back to the whole Michael Jackson situation because it's very similar. They didn't have a crime. They didn't have evidence of a crime. They had allegations. And in certain cases, certain people who claim themselves victims, who at, they said at the time when they were underage, this, that and the other happened in Diddy's case. You don't have that. You don't have men who were underage at the time coming out saying, he did this, this that I saw. You do have girls who said at the time they were underage. Diddy did this, this, this. Okay, so you got allegations, but no evidence of a thing. All the evidence that we see is around Diddy having these freak offs with grown people and having other people in the industry watching him and paying big money for what's alleged to be, you know, homosexual sexual activities, none of which is illegal. So I'm saying, I think the narrative has been distorted a little bit around the p. Diddy situation, and we're commingling different things. Are we really talking about a crime, as in the sexual assaults? Yes, in allegation form, they're alleged. So now that you're only on a hunt, try to find evidence to prove the allegations, which I think is backwards. I think evidence should be presented, and then you do the raid to find additional evidence to the crime, instead of we're going on a witch hunt to try to find evidence of something that was alleged. Because when you do that, I think you're going to fail every time. Second, we have to look deeper. We have to understand when Bill Clinton's listed on a deal with Harvey Weinstein and they're not doing anything about it. There's no raid on Bill Clinton stuff when Harvey Weinstein was the most notorious of this whole endemic situation I'm talking about, and Bill Clinton already had a pattern of having improper sexual situations in the White House with a girl who accused him. So we already knew he was the sexual predator, and yet nothing is done on the Bill Clinton side. So that's for me. I look at the bigger if Diddy did what he did, and there were illegal things that he did, and we prove it, he should be locked up. And whatever else happens to him, I got no issue with that. My issue is a lack of consistency and a lack of understanding that it's an. It's endemic in the bigger picture of power and money. And are we targeting crimes, or are we simply attacking what disgusts us, even if it's not a crime, which that's a different situation.
[00:27:47] So then the last is this circling back of the Roman Polanski situation. If you don't know the Roman Polanski situation, there's a lot of sketchy business around that, because the Roman Polanski situation was at the time, this is, we're talking the seventies at the time, Roman Polanski is this. He's this big deal, you know, photographer. Right? And so he is photographing this young lady, 13 year old young lady, and then sexually assaults her. Now, when we say sexually assaults her, I want to give a couple different pieces here, because later, his accuser would come out multiple times and say, I. I've moved on, and I don't have a problem. This is what it was. It happened. He apologized, and I accepted it, and I've moved on. And it seems like the justice system is being unfair to him, because although what happened, happened, and although it was wrong, he has. He's. He said, I regretted what happened, and I'm apologizing for what happened. And he served time, because he did serve time. So the accuser has basically said, I'm good. Okay, why are you still going after him? I'm the victim here. I'm good. What's really going on? Well, there's a whole shady story around this, and this is why I say it's endemic to power and money in the industry overall.
[00:29:06] Roman Polanski. When this assault happens, it's at the home of Jack Nicholson. Yes. Another well known person, another well known celebrity. Jack Nicholson is. Is in this whole circle of a thing. It almost compelled me to develop a tool that shows a web of interconnections.
[00:29:24] So.
[00:29:26] So this. So the incident happens here. He does the photoshop. He does the. He essentially rapes her because that's what it was, is essentially rape because she's underage, but also beyond her age. It's the nature of. I mean, there's sodomy involved. There's. It's a. I don't want to say violent, but essentially violent form of sexual assault. So they prosecute him. He's indicted on the counts. He pleaded not guilty after he pleaded not. And he pleaded not guilty because at the time, he said, I'm guilty of this, okay, this. I'm guilty. This I did, which was I had sex with a minor because that's a crime. And he said, yes, I did it. And he, at the time, claimed that he was not mentally 100%. So he gets a psych eval. After he does the psych eval, he goes to prison. After he goes to. After he comes out of prison, he wants time served, probation. Then there's. Here's where the sketchy business happens. So the judge involved in the case basically had agreed to the plea deal, so it agreed to, okay, you're going to go to the psych deal. You're going to go to prison, and as part of the plea, you'll be released and be on probation, so time served. Okay. And you'll be released after the probation period. The judge was caught later, after, you know, on a private. So they were in a private situation telling somebody else that he was going to disregard the deal that he agreed to and was going to. He was going to be on a mission to lock Polanski up because he had a personal vendetta against the situation that happened. So now the attorney gets involved for. The victim gets involved, understands that, yeah, the judge is just going to go rogue. There's actually a law and order episode about this where you have a judge that wants to throw the book at the criminal, even though the criminals, the crime. There was already an admission. There's already a plea deal. It's agreed on both sides. Everything else but the judge themselves, because they were lobbying to be. To go up in the ranks, was going to disregard this. So now Polanski is looking at 50 years, even though everything had been agreed and on the table. Right. So now there's questions about the judges behavior. That's what triggered Polanski to run and go overseas, is because he saw he was about to be. He's. They were about to throw the book at him. People would do analysis and say what he did was wrong, because what he should have done is just follow the process, do the appeals, and the. You know, it would have been thrown out. But by that point, Polanski would have served time in the larger situation. He'd have served more time. It could have taken 510 years before anything was really going to happen. And in. In Polanski's mind, no, I'm not going to do this. This is wrong. I did my plea. I did my time. I should not have to serve anything else. I did what I was supposed to do under what was agreed. The legal system said, yeah, but you're supposed to follow the process. Corrupt judges happen all the time, but you're supposed to. You're supposed to follow the.
[00:32:22] Okay, so now, Pallas, he's overseas, and he's. He's literally hiding out overseas. He's protected. He's. He's. They're protecting him, Francis. Protecting him. They're keeping him from being extradited. This has been going on for decades, mind you, and they're still trying to pulling back, okay? He doesn't interview. Polanski does an interview, and he's talking about, come on, if I had killed somebody, this wouldn't be that big of a deal, right? If I killed somebody, it wouldn't be that big of a deal, but because of, and I want you to put your mind in, if you were born at this time, back in the sixties and the seventies, where this was less of a social media thing, he says, well, if I killed somebody, nobody would care that much. Here's the example there. Phil Spector literally kills somebody in his home, caught by the police with the gun, and they still struggle to make a case against the guy. It wasn't. He had to admit that he did it. And even then, he only got 15 years. Phil Spector died in prison. But they struggled to convict him. Like they. They literally were doing everything they could not to convict this man. When he killed somebody, OJ Simpson, they had all this fabricated evidence because some of it was fabricated, let's be honest, fabricated evidence. But there's a brutal double murder right outside of this is somebody directly connected to him, and that case remains unsolved. So the point Polanski is making is when it's murder, you guys don't care at all. But, okay, we have sex. In his mind, he's talking consensual, have sex with girls, and all of a sudden you want to go on a witch hunt and try to attack people. And that's what. It's wrong. Okay, after he does the interview, now the victim, so the victim then gets pressured by her people and everybody else to know, this is wrong. You need to get. You need to. You need to get some money. If nothing else, civil right? Civil case. Because OJ Simpson lost the civil trial. He won the criminal case. He lost the civil case, because no matter what civils a given, there was harm. There was damage, there was something. So people were pressuring the victim for the Polanski to say, you got hurt. No, you need to get some money out of this. Well, okay, so she agrees to do this. Polanski loses, owes over $600,000. Okay, Polanski agrees. Fine, I'll pay it. He pays it. Afterwards, the victim comes back. The victim's now moved on. She's married. She's moved on and says, no, I don't want him. He doesn't need to be punished. He doesn't need any of the consequences. He doesn't need to serve time. He's already served time. He paid the settlement for the civil. Leave him alone. This is 2000 ish with Larry King.
[00:34:55] Fast forward. Us in 2009 is still going after this guy. The US coerces Switzerland to try to get him extradited. If this sounds very similar to what's happening to the people like Do Kwan and Sam Bankman, you know, there's all these where the United States is trying to strong arm to try to get people, you know, because they want to be the one to do it. They want to be the one to enforce justice because they are responding to social sentiment. That's. That's why that happens internationally. They're trying to protect Polanski because ultimately the extradition, there's no real strong case because of what happened with the judge. What happened with the judge was improper. So my point is, at no point has Polanski denied that he had this interaction with the victim. And Polanski has admitted what he did was wrong. At the time, it was wrong. And at the time Polanski served time and he had a plea deal in place that was agreed, and he did everything that he was asked to do at the time. But then the witch hunt continued.
[00:35:57] So then people that are making this connection between the way that P. Diddy's treated and Roman Polanski are way off the rocker. The way off the rocker, because in Polanski's case, there was evidence of something that happened. It happened, and there's a victim, there's evidence, and it's the specific situation.
[00:36:16] But what people didn't understand is that Polanski's connect was larger than what happened in that one incident.
[00:36:24] The victim would then later do interviews and come out and say, and Pulaski's wife come out, do interviews and say, I think people don't understand that during this time. And even now, there's just kind of an understood ritual, I'll call it, in the industry. So she's talking about this endemic. I'm talking about that when you're a young gal. And I put young in quotes because young means a lot of things to a lot of people. When you're a young gal and you're in a situation where there's an opportunity for fame or an opportunity for money, and I don't even think it's just applicable to females, because if you think about Terry Crews, he's another one that talked about being sexually assaulted. I think it's endemic, truly endemic to the industry.
[00:37:09] But she says, when you're a young gal and you're in that situation, you got a choice to make. This could be life changing. You could be in the next movie, you could be a millionaire, you could be a celebrity. Your dreams come true. And this man who's older is saying, yeah, if you suck me off, then this is what I'm going to get you. And even if you get in a contract.
[00:37:29] Well, we know that happens. We know it happens. But society, so I'm talking about the law again. Society has said it's not acceptable, right. You can't impose your power over other people.
[00:37:42] You can't. And you cannot do this, certainly with an under 18 person. So there's certain societal expectations you cannot do no matter what. Even if we knew from the seventies and even probably prior that this was an acceptable something, we knew what it was. Well, now connected to Vince McMahon very most recently, and the allegations against him that have been going on for years. Well, it's the same thing because it's endemic to the larger situation. And that's why I say it's got nothing to do with black America or none. It's this, this culture is normal. The only difference, and the reason it's coming out in pockets is because there are some women who they did the spigot got cut off with the Vince McMahon situation. He cut off payments to the girl. He stopped paying her. Her text openly admitted she was a willing participant in what was going on. When the payment stopped, all of a sudden she's going after it, and now it's assault. And it's. And the absolute disgusting nature of what was claimed elevates it in the minds of social media. So now he gets tried in the public opinion and then other people around him that knew it was happening. But it's a. It's a deal. It's something she signed. She consented to doing it at the time, and then he stopped paying her. Why did he stop paying her? Because he realized it was a stupid deal. He got older and realized, I should never sign that deal, pal. But Polanski at the time, he said, you know what? This is normal because other people are doing it. That gets to the Harvey Weinstein situation. Harvey Weinstein at the time, this was going back years. This is what I'm saying. It's, it's a bigger. It's bigger. It's larger. It's everywhere. It's all over the place. It's not one person. It's not just PDD. It's not just r. Kelly. It's not just Bill Cosby. It's. It's a larger situation. And if you look at the pattern, it all comes to pockets around the seventies and the eighties, where that was kind of a norm when you were in a position of power, and then you make an agreement, whether consensual or not, but you make an agreement. And I would argue if there was an agreement, in place, like something signed. There's consent by way of the signature. But I'm saying, society has said, if you're under 18, you cannot consent.
[00:39:59] But at the time, parents had to know. Right? So, because with the Michael Jackson situation, it came out that parents knew that these things were happening, that their child was there, but they wanted money out of the guy, and so they told their kid to accuse him when there was no evidence. But they knew because there were so many accu accusations and accusers, they were going to get something out of it from the civil trial. That's what happened with Bill Cosby and why he was eventually released, because all they had was the civil case. And then money gets exchanged. Well, that's the pattern. This is not to defend any of the situations that have been alleged or actually happened.
[00:40:38] It's explaining that it's endemic. And every last one of these is boiling back down to money and spearheaded by the media, pushing a narrative. It is endemic. It's not all men, it's not all women, but it's endemic to a certain subset of culture that has been there for decades. And it's not going to go away no matter what you do, because the government empowers it. They allow it. They enable it. You just had cocaine found in the White House, and they claim they can't figure out who did this business.
[00:41:10] The president getting a blowjob in the White House, and nothing happens to him. And then later, he's found on the Harvey Weinstein list, and nothing happens to him. Do you see what I'm saying? Joe Biden's kid is on film and video with underage people and cocaine binges and messages that imply that the president was somehow involved and nothing happens to them. It's endemic to power. And the ones who can fight back, fight back. The ones who can't fight back, at some point, they're going to wash. Michael Jackson had money to fight, so he kept fighting. Bill Cosby, he gave his money away. He gave his money to colleges. He gave his money to all these other things. He didn't have the money to keep fighting and fighting and fighting, and eventually they got him. R. Kelly was going near broke for whatever damn reason he was, but going near broke when they got him. So when money no longer can be a thing or your local United States, they're gonna go after you. And because they're trying to just send a message to the social public, we. We did something. You know, we. We followed what it was. We yay, you know, keep electing us in the office, when off the side, these same people are probably doing the same thing. They've got those shady deals. It's just that the women in those cases, they're complicit. They go along with it, and they don't say anything because the money keeps flowing those directions. This is a. This is endemic. I'm not excusing it. I'm saying it's endemic. It's everywhere. It's not just a p. Diddy situation. That's why I'm sad about it, because I knew with P. Diddy, it's like, he's got enough money at his height. There's got to be something there. And then Danity Kane and other people have spoken out and alleged there was something going on there. But there are so many that want to be celebrities, and they want to be the. The next musician, or they want to be the next rapper. They want to be in a movie. And it happens. I mean, geez, it's been talk show hosts where they've been accused of stuff happening there. It's. It's everywhere. It's been everywhere. And it's not going to go away with what happened with P. Diddy. It's going to happen again and again. But I'd like people to stop talking about damage to black community, because him going down, if he does, doesn't damage black community.
[00:43:26] What damages black community. What really damages black community are people who go along with disgusting behavior. That's what damages black community.
[00:43:35] It's not, oh, they're going up to him and not Roman. Stop. It's a chewbacca. We need to focus in house if we really want to try to fix on black culture and true damage to black culture. Seeing coy Lerae out there doing essentially lap dances off when she's not talented at all, and doing lap dances to try to sell tickets. Nicki Minaj shaking her breasts to sell tickets. And the sex culture, as it's described by Lord Jamar, you know, the whore culture, that's what damages the black community. Because, remember, the context used to be black men who disrespect women. That used to be the thing when you had video hoes and all that kind of stuff, which are still a thing now. The women kind of embrace that horror culture, and they go out and do that stuff. Well, that's. That's what damages black culture, because those celebrities influence the young people as influencing the young people. It gives them the mind that that's okay. Coy Lerae song straight said girls are players, too, and talk okay, so that's the culture that now is acceptable, is treatment as throwaway. How can that not be damaging to black culture? It is. Nobody's listening to the conservative voice out there that says, well, let's go back to the standards of relationships and the standards of a nuclear family and traditional senses and pride and generational wealth and all these. Nobody's listening to those because nobody's talking about those because the people who have their eyes on the product through social media, they're influencing it away from that. That's continuing to happen. I see it happen countless times, and it's going to keep on happening.
[00:45:20] And I believe, this is my theory.
[00:45:23] I believe that all these things you're seeing about P. Diddy, things about Bill Cosby, things about Morgan Freeman, I believe all of these are deflections to the real problem in black culture. It doesn't excuse any of what may or may not have happened. I'm saying they're deflections away from the real damage to black culture.
[00:45:44] One person said, well, interracial dating is a byproduct of this. How can that be? What sense does that make? Interracial dating has nothing to do with that. Interracial dating is a thing. The problem is, are you dating interracially because there's truly a connection, or is it simply a sexual attraction that brought you together? I think certain people in their mind feel like, well, no, I'm doing it because I really care about that person and I want to spend life with that person. Sure. But now what's the downstream impact of that decision? I'm talking external, internal family, because cultural family disagreements seem to trend higher when you have that happen. Jamie Foxx, who purposely dated interracial, he did not. He dated. That's what he was. And then all of a sudden, he has this major medical issue. Nobody to this day knows exactly what happened. He came back, he's completely different person.
[00:46:44] And others who have dated interracially and seem to not be mentally all there or safe for whatever reason. Tiger woods. Right. It seems like that there's a pattern. Why ever that is, I'm not saying there's a specific correlation. I'm saying there's a pattern. So when they say, well, yeah, interracial, is that. Cause I don't agree with that either.
[00:47:06] Why would people choose to do that? People can't help who they're attracted to.
[00:47:11] But if we look at the culture that black women are promoting, which is the so called, quote, horror culture, as a black male, do you want to be on that. And then those women may not want to deal with the normal black men that are out there trying to be successful. So now you got to disconnect where they're not connecting. And so they go everywhere else, and they go interracial, because that's the only way they can find those relationships. Okay, that's cool. But then when you end up with a p. Diddy type situation where it's kind of this quid pro, they get to. So black men or even black women get to, because the whole Lizzo business, I think it's Lizzo business, you get to a point of power, and then all of a sudden, there's all these sexual assault claims and improper whatever claims and abuse claims. It's all about the power. It's all about the power. So when women or men get to a point of power and they start abusing the power, that's where the focus should be, which is why I say it has nothing to do with race. It has everything to do with power, money, getting up there.
[00:48:12] Then it becomes quid pro all over the place, because you can afford to do it, and there are people desperate for it, and they're going to make those deals. But society doesn't accept that. Society does not accept quid pro arrangement for under certain situations, which is why in the vast majority of states, prostitution is illegal, which takes it. Does what? Takes it underground. It promotes drugs, and it promotes these kind of abuses because you could have a runaway who's 16, and then they find somebody who's wealthy, 20 something year old mogul, like a P. Diddy, right? And that person says, well, I'll take you off the street. Let's say they're at a strip club. Strip clubs look the other way for age discrepancy. This mogul finds him in the strip club, says, I want to get you out of here. I'll pay you x. And you come and you, you know, let's have some fun. Society does not accept that. Is it abuse under the law? Yes, it is. Was that person trying to do right? Maybe society doesn't accept that because you did. You. You broke the law when you did that.
[00:49:15] These are the realities of power. These are the realities of that upper tier and why it'll never stop. Because it's the. It's what actually keeps a lot of this stuff moving. Consider if you didn't have those people doing that and you got homeless teens. Our government's not doing anything to help homeless teens. Our government's not helping drugs. They're not helping the drug crisis at all. Our government isn't doing anything for that tier, enabling that very powerful, you know, struggle to happen because they're not doing anything to solve the underlying reason why they're able to do it. You're putting that out. You're leaving that out there. It's. It's food on the table, and you're leaving it for them.
[00:50:01] How do I. How did I put that together?
[00:50:04] Think about why the mob largely went into the. Into the shadows, why it's no longer as prominent as it is, as it was. What was the mob most known for? Loans.
[00:50:20] Loans got easier to get. The mob rose because loans money was hard to get at a time when everybody needed it.
[00:50:29] So when you're able to get access to money through illicit means, right, back deals with banks, back deals with law enforcement, back deals in construction, back deals with casinos, back deals in boxing, when you're able to generate money that others don't have access to, and then you can create these loans, and they were predatory loans, but you're able to do that. Well, now look at your. The world's the. The world's your yard. You can pick and choose all of these people who need that money and create this industry, pay judges and law enforcement to look the other way because they know they're actually doing a service that we can't offer. But in exchange, it's like you've got this criminal, criminal subculture. Because then it goes into drugs and everything else that. That we don't want guns, we don't want that. But at the same time, they're moving money and moving money does what? Tax revenue.
[00:51:25] My point is, with this whole endemic culture, I'm talking about a power. The only reason it's allowed to do what it's doing is because the government enables the victim to be a victim. It enables the victim to be a victim. It enables impoverished young girls, it enables homelessness, it enables drugs, it enables this tier. And doesn't want to solve those problems because it's too busy trying to sort out the trans agenda. That's a non agenda. It's too busy trying to cater. When you got trans people on the White House flashing people, because we knew they're not really oppressed, they just want to say, yeah, I did a thing. And that's where their attention is, because that's what social media tells them to do, because it's a deflection. Meanwhile, while that's happening, this has never been solved. Consider how long homelessness has really been a problem. Consider how long you've had these underage people who get in situations. It's been decades and has never been fixed. That is not, to me, a symptom of anything other than an endemic problem from power down that the government could solve. As with mobs, where loans were made easier, deregulation comes into place. It's easier now to have access to money, and money is flowing more freely, which negated the true value of mom, you negate. The true value of mob, you negate what? The excessive risk of drugs, the excessive risk of guns. They didn't go away. Do you know why they didn't go away? Because the government needs those things to still be here, to have something to do. That's what you're seeing with the victim situation, with the PDD's and everything else. It's all together. It's all together and goes back up to the government not doing what's necessary. And this the Polanski situation, the Bill Cosby situation, R. Kelly situation, the Michael Jackson situation, they do everything that they feel like they're supposed to be doing to act like they're doing something. We got to show that we're doing something. We got to show that. We got to show that we're worth the money that they're paying. Instead of fixing the root cause of why it happens in the first place, they're going to keep happening. It's not about Diddy. It's not about black culture. It's not even about men, because there are women out there who are abusing. Oprah's been accused of stuff, Lizzo's been accused of stuff, Whoopi's been accused of stuff. It doesn't have anything to do with. It's just an endemic thing to power. It's what it is and will continue. And nobody wants to solve the root cause of why it happens. Because it's in their financial interest to keep it a problem, because that's what keeps them employed. If you solve all these things, what do I need your law enforcement stuff for? So when you saw defund the police frequently trending, you know what that was? That's a deflection. Let's defund the police. And then there actually are people out there actively defunding police. What happens? Crime goes up. Crime goes up. Because they know, even though significantly nothing changed, they know that they can just go ahead and the government will kowtow to everybody who deflects. And the moment you take your eye off the prize and stop doing your job, that's what happens. This is why you don't see frequently a lot like you don't see, you know, tens and tens of celebrities happening every single week, coming out talking about sexual abuses. I guarantee you there's tons of them. But they're quid pros. They are agreements where the female in question, if it's a female or the male in question, if it's a male, is there. They're fine with what they got. They were accepting what they got, and they're staying silent because they don't see themselves as victims. They see themselves as beneficial beneficiaries. They're benefiting from this noise because they know they can hold that power person hostage. It's a two way now. It's like, okay, you. You renege on what we agreed to, and I'll scream rape or all whatever. And so now the money keeps flowing. So this person down here is happy.
[00:55:26] That's the reality of it. As unfortunate as it is. That's why it's sad. It's sad because let's step back and really think about what it's really doing. It's distracting from the real issues. It's distracting from everybody else, and it's focusing in one corner, a very dark corner, but it's focusing one corner at the expense of everything else that we got. That's a problem because the current administration ignored trying to address other issues to get them out of the way so that there could be focus here without disrupting this. Meanwhile, the wars and everything else are another distraction. Everything is a distraction. That's why I said before, I'm concerned for society after we're all long gone, because there's not been a. Social media has caused a lack of focus on the right things, and there's been a push to focus on the wrong things. I'm sorry, the whole LGBTQ whatever agenda was the wrong focus. It was not something that was going to benefit everybody. It focuses one pocket. This, with the P. Diddy focuses on one pocket. Meanwhile, the economy is still in tatters and has never been addressed, and we don't seem to want to address it. There's all sorts of other problems that affect everybody that we're ignoring because we're too busy focusing on these one smaller pocket issues, that a lot of them were always issues. They were issues for decades. While all of a sudden, the focus on it because it's a deflection, it's a. It's a chewbacca, it's. Let's focus on that one. And meanwhile, everything else is burning around us. That's what it is. And that's our new reality. And that's why it's sad. It's sad because it's not going to stop. It's not going to stop with Diddy. It's not going to stop with any of them. And it's got nothing to do with race. It's got everything to do with who you vote for in office. Are you focused on somebody who's mean and calls names, or are you focused on somebody who's failed? And if you vote for somebody simply because you don't like them calling names and doing mean tweets, if you vote for somebody because you, because they're black, right. If you vote for somebody because they dance on Ellen DeGeneres, that means you're part of the problem. You're part of the problem. You are an enabler to people like Diddy because you're hiring the people in the office who look the other way to this kind of stuff. Because consider there are people who have been elected in office who have been found guilty of these very same offenses. There are people who have been elected in office that you elected that you thought were the right answer, who have done some very shady stuff. Very shady stuff. And I'm saying, I'm asking, it's an impassioned plea. Stop voting with your emotions and think it through.
[00:58:13] We need people who are willing to actually fix everybody's situation because by fixing everybody's situation, it by necessity fixes all these dark pockets of nonsense. If we don't have desperate young girls because we're making it easier to get those opportunities without having to resort to those things, if we have better control over the flow of alcohol, if we have better control over casting calls, quote unquote, if we control the industry without suppressing it, as in control it, manage it, but also enable everybody to have a level playing field which we don't currently have. The employment situation, it's too difficult for people to get good paying jobs. The prices of things are going up faster than what the job is willing to pay, and those employers are doing everything they can not to hire you. Then you taught Dei and ESG.
[00:59:12] There's too many barriers to people making a living. Those barriers create desperation. Desperation lends itself to these predators. So by doing that, you're, I say you're enabling that behavior because you're not fixing the underlying, which is stop the employers from blocking people from getting jobs. That's not about EEOC, by the way, or affirmative action. It is employer. You are not allowed to hire somebody simply because of a DEI quotient. You're not allowed to deny somebody a job simply because they choose to apply in paper. You're not allowed to force somebody to give you references. You're not allowed to do credit checks to determine whether to hire somebody. You're not allowed to require excessive experience beyond what the job entails. You're not allowed to just fire somebody because you feel like it. Like things that actually enable the regular people to get into opportunities to make some money so that they don't have to resort to desperation. Are you still going to have the power deal? Yes, but when they're in a controlled job instead of a contractor. Now there's already laws protecting you. If you're already in a job and you're working under some CFO and that CFO makes a pass at you, you already have protections. You don't have protections. When you're just a regular contractor, actor, musician, to be working under some mogul, you have no protections. And they go that route because they have a dream. But there's less opportunity for them to work their way up in some other industry to make enough money to where they can realize their dream without having to resort to those tactics. That's my stake. That's why I'm disappointed in what I see, because we're not fixing the root cause of the problem.
[01:00:54] Tell me what you think. Am I off my rocker? Am I crazy? Am I crazy for thinking that the reason this is allowed to continue happening is because we don't enable people to generate their own wealth? Bottom line, we don't make it easier than to do it, which creates desperation. This is not about victim blaming. I want people in general, men or women. I want them to have the opportunity to make enough money to realize their dreams without having to agree to quit pro. Without having to go to a hotel room, without having to get on a plane, without having to sleep with somebody, without having to flash something? That's what I'd like to see.
[01:01:51] Oh, close.
