[00:00:05] You're listening to casual talk radio, where common sense is still the norm, whether you're a new or a longtime listener. We appreciate you joining us today. Visit
[email protected] and now here's your host, Lyster.
[00:00:21] There are going to be some people out there who, two days ago, Saturday, Saturday evening, Saturday evening brought back memories for them. There are going to be people out there that went through what the world went through two days ago.
[00:00:39] There were people that listened to the show. And you are old enough to remember what happened to former president Ronald Reagan. Former president Ronald Reagan was, he was a victim of an assassination attempt. There's, it was photographed quite well. The photos are all over the web. You can, you can search them yourself if you want to. But assassination attempt that happened. And the, it was a very similar, odd situation. Mind you, though, what happened Saturday is appalling for different reasons. I'm not even going to talk about the lapse of security because it was a clear lapse of security. Like, I have my own thoughts on that, that I'll get into that part. You know, my own thoughts of some of that. It's really just, there's justice for thee not for me syndrome going around. That's going to be the, my messaging because I'm, I don't want to say I'm an emotional wreck. I'm never an emotional wreck. I would say I'm emotionally distracted. That's probably the best way to state it, which is why I'm recording this somewhat early in the morning on Monday. I wanted to get it while it's still there, fresh the pictures in the video. Seeing this live for and thinking back to an older time, you know, we would, as a nation gather around the tv. Usually there's only one tv. We'd gather around the tv and we would watch these candidates get up and speak.
[00:02:08] Obviously now, many people are not doing that. They're distracted on their phones, texting, whatever the, you know, or they're watching some garbage reality show or watching Netflix nonsense. They're watching something that has no real intrinsic educational value, rather than watching these candidates get up and talk about what they're going to do to save our nation, because our nation needs saving. So when I watch and for those that didn't see it, again, when I watch Donald Trump and what he's talking about, and I know the game, I know the rhetoric, I already know the messaging, I already know what he's going to talk about. He's talking about the things that need to be heard and the people that are not listening to him right now are the people that don't like him as a person. So that right there is the gap. And why I'm kind of disgusted because I see that the reaction is slanted once again towards not liking a person, aka mean tweets. It's not around listening to the message. It's not around listening to the guy talk. Let me tell you something.
[00:03:16] I learned to separate what I think of a person from the way that they act or behave. I had to. Because in the workplace, you're constantly confronted by blatantly incompetent people, right? They may be nice as all hell, but they're blatantly incompetent. Or you run into the nicest people in the world and they can't wipe their ass with their hand. So I see a blend. And you have to learn to tolerate, unfortunately, one or the other. You're never going to get that perfect synergy of somebody who is perfectly nice and perfectly competent.
[00:03:56] You know, it's an extreme outlier. So I learned it's better to focus on what is important to me.
[00:04:04] Donald Trump talks about the things that are important to me, which is the economy, primarily. Donald Trump talks about the principles of a nuclear family, which is important to me because I understand that these things are important to future society.
[00:04:23] The current modern eradic has been swayed by the greater tunbergs of the world to believe that the now is what you need to focus on. Some of what she'll talk about is for, well, in 30 years, the planet won't be here. They said the same thing 30 years ago. There's no backing evidence of any of the data. And a lot of what we see in some of these, you know, natural disruptions that happen, that truly do happen. It's not that we shouldn't do anything. And nobody has said we shouldn't do anything. People have said that we should take it as a conservative approach, create a strong plan and tiptoe towards it over time, because it took us centuries to get to this point. It's not going to be unraveled in a decade or two. That's all people have said. But there's this impatience coming from an angry child at the time, screaming and yelling at adults, and then they get a sympathetic voice. And now you have converted some of these young people to think that that's the right answer. They're listening to that side. They're listening to that. They're looking for first black vice president. They're looking for a first woman president. They're looking for all these things that make them feel good, not necessarily the things that solve the problems that we have for our future. The economy has been broken for a long time, even prior to Trump's president first presidential reign. It can, it got way worse under Joe Biden and nobody can, nobody can say with a straight face that they're financially better off. They're not. We are in a very bad situation. And Biden was not inclined to fix it. The border is out of control. Biden himself said he was going to unravel all of the things that Donald Trump had put in place, only to turn around and extend those very things because he realized, okay, it actually is out of control. He never backtracked to say, you know what, Donald Trump was right. I got it wrong when I said that it was not out of control. I'd lied to the american people when I told you that he never backed that.
[00:06:26] You get the whole Covid situation forcing vaccines on people, which now later we're hearing, okay, there's probably some going to be some problems with some people that took it. They can't say directly what they are, but they are finding that there are some situations where certain physiologies are reacting negatively to it. Remember, you still can catch COVID regardless of having the vaccine. It didn't prevent you from getting it. But remember, it was Joe Biden who went on the air and said, you're okay, you're, you're not going to get the thing if you get the vaccine. He lied to you. He lied multiple times, just like Obama had lied multiple times to people. People are reacting to what makes them feel good. So they're falling for the lies until they become surfaced as lies. But by that point, it's too late. The damage has been done. That's why you shouldn't react to what makes you feel good. You should react to what you are actually feeling as a benefit, a true benefit, not what somebody tells you as a benefit.
[00:07:27] People were walking around and then the media's part blamed for this. People were walking around maskless during the situation, when people were trying to force masks. There were people who just were defiant on this.
[00:07:38] Statistically, an extremely low number of people died because of COVID Statistically, when I say statistically, you cannot just look at when they toss out a number of a million, when there's over 300 million Americans, just America. Okay, really? So less than 1% of the population and you're still freaked out about it because the number million, it's a fallacy. They're doing that to trigger you. They're doing that to trigger your sensibilities.
[00:08:06] Donald Trump is the one who initiated the vaccine project, fast track or whatever it was, initiate the vaccine against people. And then what did he do? He said, I strongly encourage you. Take it. That's all he said. He didn't do Biden, where he literally got on the air and threatened Americans who wouldn't get it, threatened employers who wouldn't force it. That is dictatorship. The dictatorship, the lack of focus on the economy, the increased focus on unsustainable things. The whole situation happened in Chicago with the EV's, which was not Biden's direct fault, but him pushing away from the keystone and pushing away from fossil fuels and rushing to Ev's and doing all this stuff, all of that. Everything that he did caused a negative sentiment on Joe Biden.
[00:08:55] Kamala Harris didn't do anything to mitigate it, especially because during, when she was campaigning to be president against Joe Biden, she straight called the guy a racist and then turned around and became his vice president. So she lost credibility. I believe she lost credibility in the black community. Maybe I'm wrong, but I believe that she did because, like, what she did, Joe Biden said, well, if you don't vote for me, they ain't black. He said that vote. He verbally, and people gave him a pass for that. People gave, made excuses for that. What does that say when you say things like, if you don't vote for me, then you ain't black? We just had Swalwell, who was in response to Ben Shapiro, back and forth. And Swalwell said something to the effect of, if we don't allow these illegals in the country, who's going to pick the fields and pick the cotton in the fields?
[00:09:47] This is what I'm saying. And Democrats in the past have said, well, if we get rid of our slaves, who's going to pick the cotton?
[00:09:54] You have to understand the larger narrative of what their messaging is. They're pretty blatant about their disdain for american citizens. The opposite side, which is the republican side, they're all about business because they're trying to make sure everybody's getting paid at some level. And that's their primary focus. They've never said otherwise. Their primary focus is to make sure everybody's getting paid at some level, not focusing on these tertiary things that really don't matter, the big grant scheme, and they actually hurt the overall because if those people are not paying taxes, it doesn't benefit the larger economy, which goes then to Donald Trump.
[00:10:36] He has talked about on constant basis how, you know, the tax situation is a nightmare. Illegal immigration is a nightmare. What happened with the Keystone was a nightmare. What happened with COVID was a nightmare because. Because it shut down businesses. Everything he's talked about are impacts to economy.
[00:10:52] It all circles around impacts to economy. I'd say 80% of his messaging is this. Then he's talking about how there's a loss of. He specifically calls out christian values.
[00:11:03] It doesn't matter what your denomination is. I don't think. I think it's really more about religious alignment. You know, one nation under God, indivisible. And there's a push, there has been a pushback to even having that messaging because of this myth about separation of church and state, which is not in any law, by the way. It's not.
[00:11:25] There was an intent to keep them separate for the purposes of governance.
[00:11:32] Governance in terms of who runs what and why and how. There always has been some level of separation of church and state, but it was never a straight line.
[00:11:44] Here's a great example on this. During COVID the churches were being forced to close. The churches were being blocked from being able to congregate.
[00:11:54] Churches have the right to congregate by the very nature of them being churches. However, that was built into the financial side of things. The idea that you are allowed to congregate peacefully, and as a result of that congregation, you are required to pay certain right. So the in, in financial situation, it's a whole ball of string that all ties back to money. At the end of the day, there has never been a definitive authority for the church. There has never been any sort of contradiction of authority for the government with respect to the church. The church cannot dictate things that override what the government says. The government can freely dictate things that override what the church says, with the exception of anything that has to do with money. So the government cannot tell the church, you have to now start paying taxes as a regular business.
[00:12:53] They have to prove that that church no longer meets the guidelines of the church protections for. For tax exemption.
[00:13:02] They have to go through the process. They have to go through the legal pride. Most of them don't.
[00:13:08] But I want to make sure I emphasize to people out there, there is no law around the separation of church and state. There are mentions to the intent to keep them separate for the purposes of governance. Governance has always been separate in that regard.
[00:13:25] Trump has never said otherwise. Trump has simply said that we're losing some of the religious values that formed the nation in the first place, which that's factually true. Religious values formed the very backbone of the country. And at the time, yes, it's true, vast majority was Christianity, but it wasn't only Christianity, it. Religious denominations across the board started this. So he's talking about the lack of things like religious schools, the lack of things like, you know, being raised in religious households and wanting to be part of religious society.
[00:14:05] There's a sector, and I saw this myself, there's a sector out there who straight said, because there's a project 2025 spinning around and that one's being attacked like crazy and there's people trying to debunk it. A, and b, I would say this, and I'm not going to talk about 2025 here. I would say this. I directly heard myself people say they don't want their taxpayer money going towards religious education.
[00:14:34] I understand.
[00:14:36] I don't have a skin in that because I don't have kids going through any sort of school, so I don't have a skin in that. But I understand why people would be against their taxpayer money going towards religious education because it appears to violate the intent of keeping separation of church and state. However, again, I go back, it. That intent starts and ends with governance. When you talk money, it's a different ballgame. Some of your taxpayer money is already going to benefit religious organizations today, the very land that they're built on in some way. Some of your money supports. Your money directly supports the streets and the roads that send people to those places. Your money partially supports some of the utilities that support those operations. Your money partially supports the supplies that go into the supplies that they use to do the education, aka printing of a bible. Your money partially supports these organizations anyway in some way, shape, form or fashion. Whether you understand that or not. Your money is already going there and it doesn't matter what you have to say about it. You can't say, I don't want my money to go to streets because if you do that, you won't have streets. There are some people who would say, well, we don't need streets.
[00:16:06] That's. That's ignorant. That's. That's a person who's being unreasonable about their antagonistic view that they are so against something, they're no longer reasonable.
[00:16:20] You have to understand society, the just words. Society means all of us, not just the pockets of people that you support.
[00:16:29] So you have to accept and embrace, and I think this is a young people dynamic. It feels like it. You have to accept and embrace the way that our country was built financially, I'm talking the way our country was built is that everybody is essentially contributing to the whole.
[00:16:47] And your money is being spread hundreds of thousands of different ways to support that. In. When you start saying that we want to cut off money to one part of this, just because there's a section of people who have been influenced by this person over here, you're not, that's not a structured society, you're not going to support society's health that way.
[00:17:11] Therein is the flaw and therein is the gap is the intent. Like Planned Parenthood's great example, right? We, there's a section of people who want to defund Planned Parenthood and defund everything around them. Not understanding that you can defund the organization directly. It's not going to matter because you're still, some of your money is still going to support all of the different things that support Planned Parenthood being there, and that's not going to stop. And they'll still take in money from different sources that essentially are still coming out of your pocket. Like businesses. If you invest in, if you have 401 ks, if you have IR's, if you have any sort of investment, that money is being spread towards multiple organizations, that money in those organizations, there's nothing stopping them from investing back into Planned Parenthood. If some money doesn't go from the government, your money is going to support these things no matter what. So the fight to try to shut off spigots on certain select things was never sustainable. Now let me flip it.
[00:18:16] Donald Trump has never said directly, in fact, this whole abortion thing is a good example here. He's never said exactly. I'm completely against that. I'm completely against that. Immigration, illegal immigration, is the only thing where he's had a true hard stance that I don't want. No, he has never said we should not. He actually supports hybrid vehicles like I do. He doesn't support the EV's because he understands that we're not ready for it from an evolutionary perspective. We're just not there yet. It takes time to really perfect the technology, and hybrid is the best way to learn more about what works and what does not re engineer our vehicles. Making our cars smaller is actually a mistake. When you're trying to go Ev's and when you're trying to go hybrids, however, making them lighter helps the vehicle to be more efficient. And so we're learning all these different aspects of it. But that's going to take some time. But there's a section of people who want to rush towards change, aka the liberals. They believe that we should just go there. We can do it. We can do it now. It takes time to unravel damage. It takes time to unravel change. It takes time to push towards things that we might think are good ideas.
[00:19:30] And if you look at the plane situation with Boeing, that's a great example. Rushing towards these newer planes are going to be all these great, efficient, all the rage and all this stuff. And what happens? Tons of planes going down, planes with doors blowing off, planes that FedEx that comes on the Runway and skids across the front.
[00:19:48] That's because you're rushing towards something you're not ready for. And I would argue deregulation played a part.
[00:19:54] When you're rushing towards things you're not ready for, you're putting people's lives at risk. That's just the nature of our country. It has always been a very slow turning boat. It's not something you can quickly turn on a dime because you're going to bring down what's already here. And it's, it's hard. It's like you built something, which I'm dealing with now, my endeavor. You build something and it's so unwieldy and it's so convoluted. It takes time to now clean it up and reorient it. And even then, it's still going to be somewhat of a, and it requires expertise, somewhat of a pain to move it in the future, but at least less painful. That's kind of how our country works. Donald Trump knows that because he's ran businesses, some of which have failed. And so you take those lessons, you understand these are going to be bad decisions if you do this. But the truth is, we didn't have these warring situations with Donald Trump in office. We didn't have, you know, Putin over there waging war. He was actually quite timid and afraid. When Trump was in charge, we didn't have Kim Jong un firing off Rocket man, firing off missiles over there. He was actually quite a calm and cool and collected with Trump in charge, even though Trump was insulting him left and right.
[00:21:06] We didn't have the shootings, mass shootings. The mass shootings declined when Trump was in office. They increased again when Biden went in office. They were already high when Obama was in office. We start seeing the person who goes in office makes a difference in some of these other tertiary things that really do matter. We don't want to see an increase in mass shootings. We don't want to see an increase in the, your grocery bill. We don't want to see that. We can't get access to the fuel that we need. And we certainly don't want to see a rush to Ev's and all this nonsense that people aren't ready for. And I don't know if you've shopped for a car lately, but the car prices are out of whack, even on the used car market. We don't want to see these things. It should be easy and accessible to do your basic functions. That is what Donald Trump has campaigned on, largely campaigned on. So any reasonable person that doesn't focus on the person, focuses on the message, listens to what I just said, and you can hear Trump saying himself, and they, there's no reason you should disagree with that approach. You should be totally supportive of a world where it's not hitting you in the pocketbook. Pocketbook. You should be totally supportive of a world that we used to have where there's not warring nations that are affecting us. We should totally be embracing of this narrative that your money should go further than it does. And yet, on Saturday, apparently a lone gunman took a shot at Donald Trump and barely grazed him. And if it hadn't been for Trump's mannerisms of constantly moving his head, he, he would have taken a bullet right in the head. Right, probably right in the eye, but right in the head, certainly he would have taken a bullet right in the head. And we would not have had a republican candidate, as in Donald Trump, going past that.
[00:22:58] When you watch that, anybody who did watch him, it should disgust you regardless of who you support. But there are people out there right now talking about, damn, how did he miss? Damn, you need a better shot. Damn, we almost hit him. And to those people, and for some people who listen to the show, let me preface with an apology. But for those people, I've got to. Because I, because for those people who said, for a person who almost got shot in the head for simply talking about the things that he wants to do to save the country, you support that by saying you wish the person was a better shot. Should I better aim? I say, fuck you. Because under no circumstances should you support somebody getting killed, first off. Second, you, under no circumstances should you support the assassination of any former or current president. I don't care who it is. And third, that you would have that message thinking about what that means, thinking about what it means, because I guarantee you, if that was somebody you were related to, you wouldn't have that same energy. I don't care if you hated them, you wouldn't have that same energy. That is the problem with society that, ironically, Trump's trying to fix.
[00:24:17] That was exacerbated by Joe Biden and to a lesser degree, Nancy Pelosi.
[00:24:23] That is what he's arguably trying to fix. He's trying to fix values. He's trying to fix it to where if your money's going further right, you feel better about your check. Jobs are of more readily available and accessible. Even if they set off the Greta Tunbergs of the world, the jobs are out there now. You can get work. It's easier to get work. It's easier to do what you need to do. Your money goes further. We don't have these wars you got to stress at overseas, the stock market's booming. If everything is financially to your benefit, it should help you feel better overall.
[00:24:56] I think the flaw in Donald's theory is he's making the assumption that there's not this subset of people who simply cannot look past the person. They cannot look past their hate of the man.
[00:25:11] The hate of the man starts to supersede anything that he's doing or saying or presenting. Ironically, despite the fact that I'm going to say it and piss some people off, every single notable person out there has done some disgusting crap. Every last one of them, including people. Savior Obama. He did some disgusting crap too. Outside of an inside of office, people look the other way because he dances on Ellen jet DeGeneres, right? That's been caused. Kanye West a jackass on the air and he's entertaining. They overlook it. That's called a chewbacca. That's what that is.
[00:25:51] All the way back to Mister Martin Luther King, whose files were sealed for 50 years. Do you know why his files were sealed? His files were sealed because of stuff that later came out in terms of prostitution that he was partaking in and other activities that he was supportive of that would have disgusted people at the time. If people knew that. If they came out, people learned about this stuff, they did disgust the people at the time. They sealed the records because they didn't want the very type of situation that just happened on Saturday to happen to somebody else only to have that same situation happen to him.
[00:26:28] Then it was spun as if it was a racist thing. You know, we shot this guy because he's talking black and freedom and all that. And that's why maybe they shot the guy because he was a piece of crap. I don't know. Because they sealed the records. When you seal the records, it creates smoke. When it creates smoke. People are going to ask those questions and it causes the very types of lone wolf people who sit in their room doing this kind of research to try to figure out what the truth is. And that's what happens, right? The unabomber, same thing.
[00:27:01] They don't understand. When I say they, I'm talking society. They don't understand that these lone wolf situations that are happening are caused by the very secrecy that they keep doing. But the government understands that if they don't do that, it'll cause more people to react.
[00:27:18] That's what contributed to the COVID freak out that Anthony Fauci caused after he caused the freakout during AidS. I've talked about all this stuff on past episodes. Go back and check it out.
[00:27:30] It's all cyclical. So I understood that. I understood. This is the game you guys play. The game you guys play is you hide information from the american public, because you hide information from the american public, it causes these lone wolves to sit off in their I basements and do this research to try to find this stuff, and then they just take it in their own hands and it causes something like this. And because it causes something like that, it gives the government an excuse to increase security, quote unquote, aka remove liberties from regular american citizens who didn't do anything wrong, because the fact is, it was a lone citizen situation. So this whole Donald Trump thing, now the Secret Service claim that they're not going to do anything that could change anything. I guarantee you they're going to change something, but they claim they're not going to change anything.
[00:28:17] The local, they say, well, hey, Secret Service runs the game. We do what they tell us to do. Somebody else says, you have an obligation, regardless of what they said, you have an obligation to protect the president. So you should have just said, screw you, bro. I'm going to protect the president. I'm in that court. I agree. If you see it, say something. They say that all the time, right? So why don't you practice what you preach? I think that local law enforcement should have taken it on their own and said, you know what, secret services, what are they going to do? They can't do anything. You're going to shoot me? You're not going to do that. So let me just do this. It's my jersey. It's my yard, okay? You're in my yard. So I'm going to do what I got to do to protect the president. And if I see that there's lapses in, obvious lapses in security, I'm going to take it on my own because there were obviously obvious lapses in this business, appalling. And I'm to the point it's creating conspiracies that this was intentionally left as a lapse. I don't think that. I don't buy that. I think what happened. This is my close out. I think what happened here. They didn't treat him as. They didn't. They disregarded him. They didn't seriously consider him a threat until it was too late. They waited for him to take a shot and then reacted because, okay, now you gave me license to shoot another article. Basically echoed what I said, that they, you know, what if it's just some kid and he's up there trying to take photos of the president from, you know, distant. First of all, a kid is not going to be up there taking photos at that distance, because you're. The photo would be crap. You'd want to be up close. Second, the sniper has a frickin scope on the rifle. The sniper was looking dead at the guy, looking dead at him. You have a scope, you have Zoom. You can see if he's holding a weapon. You can see that it's obviously a weapon, a person's camera phone that was right over next piece. Or you could even when it wasn't zoomed in, you could tell the guy's holding a rifle, looking dead at the president. So, okay, we're honestly making the excuse that this Secret Service agent couldn't tell that this person's holding a gun. And which goes back to my theory that Secret Service saw the guy, I'd say probably about two minutes before he even started shooting. I believe Secret Service disregarded him as a threat. They didn't believe he had the right aim to hit the president. They didn't believe that he was going to be able to hit Donald Trump from where he was, because if you look at the sloping of the roof, he was just behind a point where you could see him. But it would have been not easy to make the shot at the same time. If it's an. As an AR 15, with an AR 15, with the right types of mount, and at that range, it improves your ability to do it. The wind would have played a little bit of factor.
[00:31:06] I believe that the Secret Service thought, this guy is not gonna be able to make that shot. He's. He's not gonna be able to make that shot. He's a rookie. Based on where he placed himself, that he placed himself at a point where he's not gonna make that shot. And because of the sloping of the roof, they disregarded it as even capable of hitting Donald Trump.
[00:31:26] That's what I believe happened. And I based that on the reaction of the Secret Service sniper that showed on a video, an alternate video cell phone from somebody who was right in front of Trump, who was and smart. And if this guy hears that show, thank you, because this is what we need. Not the other idiot. He trained right on the sniper. The sniper, you saw him, basically, he took away from scope for a second, went back in scope. The shot comes from the shooter. The sniper reacts, he flinches a bit and then shoots. You see him shoot?
[00:32:00] That's pretty. But there were more shots fired, so that means he missed. Okay, so if that's true, let's assume it is. I don't know. That message hasn't come out yet. But let's say that's true. If he missed the sniper, that first shot, that means that the sniper, despite seeing him, because he never moved. The sniper never moved. That means he saw him, but he missed the shot. Okay? Which allowed the other gunmen to get off more shots. The gunman, it didn't look like he shot back at the sniper. It looked like he just started shooting wild. Or maybe he hit the gunman the first time and the gunman reacted. Trigger reacted. But I don't think so because there was at least eight shots that I, that I heard.
[00:32:42] Ultimately, I was disappointed. And the reason I was disgusted, I was disappointed at the people coming out talking about, how could he miss? Damn, we almost had him. All this bullshit, that disgusts me. But also the Secret Service, quote, lapse. Again, I don't buy into this conspiracy theory. I think this was a situation where they disregarded the guy. They did not treat him as a serious threat like they should have, and there's no reason not to have because of the stakes involved. What you're talking about there, that's that. The local law enforcement being told by secret service, hey, you're in charge of this over here. We're in charge of this over here. The two shall not cross. But if I'm local law enforcement, I'm going to say, screw that. I'm going to do what I need to do to protect the president. If the Secret Service ain't going to show up, I'm going to do what I got to do. There's nothing. What are they going to do, punish me for saving the president? United States, like, that's what I'm saying.
[00:33:45] I'm disappointed at the law enforcement out there in Pennsylvania. If I were to have bought into a conspiracy theory. It's there, it's local law enforcement. Because take for a second, if Secret Service told them that you're in charge of that building and nobody's on top of that building, people, spectators saw the guy climbing up the thing and reported it, presumably the law enforcement, and nobody did anything. Nobody moved to go and try to check it out or intercept it or anything. And then people are on the video. You hear a separate video, you hear people screaming, he's got a gun. As a gunman. Nobody does anything. Then nobody does anything during this whole sequence. It's got to be like a two minute sequence of time when this is being reported and nothing. The law enforcement's nowhere to be seen. I'm sorry. That's what disgusts me, because there's no reason for it. Regardless of what Secret Service says. What, what are they going to do to you? They can't do anything to you. To me, as an American and somebody who's law enforcement, who Donald Trump supported, by the way, your job is to see to his safety as a former president, and you failed, we can talk about whether secret services instructions were proper in a separate conversation. I'm more about local law enforcement apparently dropping the ball just to step up and say what they told us. We're not going to listen to this and we're going to do our own thing to keep the president safe. And that didn't happen. Then the Secret Service lapse. That was bullshit. Then people online talking about, oh, damn, how did you miss? We almost had it with all that. That was bullshit. The icing on the cake, as I wrap up is all of the different government people on the Democrat side who copy pasted their own messages, quote, has no political violence, has no place in our society. They copy pasted the same message across each other. That pissed me off. It pissed me off. Not a one of them said, you know what? Joe Biden talking about, quote, put a bullseye on Donald Trump.
[00:35:53] You know what? That was bad wording. I should not have said that. And clearly it was appropriate for me to say that. And that might have contributed to the lone wolf. And I can't know for sure because the guy's dead because of my incompetent secret security. You know, he didn't back down on the wording that might have triggered this guy, no pun intended, to go off and do this stuff. Nancy Pelosi didn't back down on the wording when she said, I don't know why they don't write anymore in the streets. Maybe they will, trying to incite violence and nothing happens to her.
[00:36:22] Maxine Waters didn't say anything about they should go and they shouldn't know.
[00:36:28] None of them backed down on their wording that incited the very violence that happened on Saturday.
[00:36:35] None of them did.
[00:36:37] Mind you, Donald Trump was impeached twice for saying, you need to fight.
[00:36:43] But Joe Biden, nothing happens to him because of what he said about bullseyes and what Pelosi said about, you know, marching in the streets and all this nonsense. None of that happens to them. That's the swamp trunk he's talking about. We see it. It's obvious, and nothing's done.
[00:36:59] So I got a chance now to again to witness a attempted assassination of a former president or current president. And it's disgusting every time it happens. And anybody who does not feel the same level disgust, I don't know what to think about your emotional state where you're not disgusted at it happening.
[00:37:20] But I'm also disheartened to see people don't understand Joe Biden and crew are largely responsible for what happened to this man, and he didn't deserve that. I don't care what you feel about him as a man. He didn't deserve to get shot at, bro. Sorry that he didn't deserve that. And hopefully see, I'll talk about maybe next week because I want the RNC to pass. That's happening, I believe, this week, Thursday, I'll talk about maybe later on the next episode. So I want to wrap this one. But I hope he is Trump. He is now more understanding about some of the fear of having access to certain weaponry. You know, that the, because the father of the shooters who bought the AR 15, and it was fairly easy for the father to get it and he legally got it. And there was no criminal, you know, record for the kid or any of that stuff. So we're not talking something where it's criminal element. We're just talking a regular routine person who got set off. And because they had access to this AR 15, they were enabled and allowed to shoot at a former president. He got taken out. And statistically, it's highly improbable that it happens again, but it could.
[00:38:43] But I'm hoping that Donald Trump now has a greater appreciation for the reason. People say there's no logical reason that this kid should even have an AR 15 or have access to it, or why an american citizen should have access to it. The dad probably goes hunting with it, that's fine. But it's it may cause Trump to think twice about being greatly supportive about certain types of weapons that are of a certain danger. Maybe because, you know, he wouldn't have had access to it, like a straight up sniper rifle.
[00:39:17] And presumably this is all speculation. Presumably there was an opportunity for the dad to have gotten involved and to better protect the weapon, as in, well, why'd you let the kid have access to the weapon? The dad's presenting like he doesn't know what the hell's going on. We know that the kid went through, there's some school program that was for guns, which surprises me. And apparently he washed out. The kid was not that good of an aim. He couldn't aim, he couldn't shoot. And so maybe that was the sole motivation. Maybe he felt like, you know what? I'll go down the blaze of glory and show that I'm a crack shot. And he probably would have been if Trump didn't have his head mannerisms that he does. And I describe all that not to praise the shooter in any way, but again, to say that perhaps Trump will take a step back and start thinking about whether it really is the right answer for people to have those kinds of weapons that create that kind of risk in the first place, you know, because if the guy had a handgun or something, it would have, nothing of this sort would have even come close to happening. Allegedly he had some sort of bomb making materials. So then that's a different problem to solve. And that may be the reason why some of the gun supporters say it's whackable. Because he had bomb making materials. He could have just created a bomb, blew up the whole darn thing. I don't think that would have supported. I don't think he would have been able to get anywhere close to cause that much damage because of the perimeter security anyway.
[00:40:46] Hopefully, everybody that was aware of what happened was disgusted, like, I am with what happened. I don't care how you feel about the man. Nobody deserves to get shot at, and nobody deserves the situation where their security fails them, blatantly fails them like that, and we shouldn't have. Where you're so against a person like that that you don't even know personally. Let's be honest, you don't even know the man personally.
[00:41:16] Think about why you're so angry at Donald Trump when you don't know the man. You're angry at policies, you're angry at actions, you're angry at him possibly sleeping with a porn star, you're angry at behaviors that chances are your parents probably did at some point, chances are your friends are probably done. At some point, chances are you know quite a few people that have done some disgusting stuff, you give them a pass because they're your friends.
[00:41:44] I understand. I'm simply saying this man hasn't done anything directly to you. And I question your vitriol against him to the point that you want to see him get shot when he didn't deserve that.
[00:42:03] How you. Oh, close.
